Few HR issues generate as many questions and disputes in Singapore as the encashment of unused annual leave when employees resign. Despite seemingly straightforward provisions in the Employment Act, the practical application of leave encashment requirements creates confusion for many employers, often leading to unnecessary disputes, MOM complaints, and even tribunal hearings.
This guide examines the legal requirements for annual leave encashment in Singapore when employees resign, highlighting both statutory obligations and best practices to help employers navigate this complex area with confidence.
Annual leave encashment in Singapore
Understanding the Legal Framework
Challenge observed:
Mei Ling, an HR manager at a local SME, believed that leave encashment was only required if explicitly stated in the employment contract. When several departing employees requested payment for unused leave, she declined, citing the absence of encashment clauses in their contracts. After the employees filed MOM complaints, she was surprised to learn that encashment of statutory leave is required by law, regardless of contractual provisions. The company had to make backpayments with interest and revise their termination procedures.
Develop clear encashment policies that account for:
Proper calculation of statutory vs. contractual leave
Prorated leave calculations for partial years
Clear documentation of encashment calculations
Specific procedures for different termination scenarios
Regular policy reviews to maintain compliance
Statutory vs. Contractual Leave: The Critical Distinction
The most fundamental concept in leave encashment is the distinction between statutory leave (mandated by law) and contractual leave (additional leave provided by the employer).
Statutory Annual Leave
Minimum 7 days for first year of service
Increases by 1 day per year of service, up to 14 days
Must be encashed upon termination if unused
Cannot be forfeited regardless of resignation circumstances
Prorated for incomplete years of service
Contractual Annual Leave
Any leave provided beyond statutory minimums
Encashment depends on company policy and employment contract terms
May be subject to forfeiture clauses in certain circumstances
May have different rules regarding proration and calculation
Challenge observed:
Jonathan's tech company offered all employees a generous 21 days of annual leave but failed to distinguish between statutory and contractual portions in their HR policies. When employees resigned, the company routinely applied contractual forfeiture clauses to their entire leave balance. A disgruntled employee sought clarification from MOM, which determined that the statutory portion (7-14 days) could not be forfeited, resulting in backpayments for multiple ex-employees.
Key insights:
Many Singapore employers incorrectly apply the same rules to all annual leave
Statutory leave must be encashed even if contracts state otherwise
For contractual leave, terms in the employment agreement prevail
Clear distinction in HR systems and policies is essential for compliance
Calculating Leave Encashment: The Right Formula
Challenge observed:
Ahmad's manufacturing company calculated leave encashment by dividing monthly salary by 30 days, then multiplying by unused leave days. When an employee disputed this calculation and contacted MOM, Ahmad learned that the correct formula uses working days per month (typically 21.75 days). The company had to recalculate and make additional payments to several former employees.
Key insights:
Proper leave encashment calculation requires:
Using the correct base salary figure (including fixed monthly allowances)
Applying the proper divisor (working days, not calendar days)
Correctly handling partial months for notice periods
Addressing performance bonuses or commissions if applicable
Practical solution:
The correct calculation formula for most employees is:
Leave Encashment = (Monthly Gross Salary ÷ Working Days per Month) × Number of Unused Leave Days
Where:
Monthly Gross Salary includes fixed monthly allowances
Working Days per Month is typically 21.75 days for a 5-day work week
Number of Unused Leave Days is prorated for partial years of service
Example calculation:
Employee with monthly salary of $5,000
10 unused leave days at resignation
Calculation: ($5,000 ÷ 21.75) × 10 = $2,298.85
Prorated Leave for Incomplete Years: Getting It Right
Challenge observed:
Linda's retail business had a policy of not prorating leave for employees who resigned before completing a full year. When a staff member resigned after 9 months with the company, Linda declined to pay for any unused leave, citing their policy. The employee filed a MOM complaint, which clarified that statutory leave must be prorated even for partial years. Linda had to revise their policy and make payments to affected employees.
Key insights:
Proper proration of leave for incomplete years involves:
Calculating leave entitlement proportionate to months worked
Rounding to the nearest half-day (typically)
Applying proration to both accrued and consumed leave
Making adjustments for excess leave taken if applicable
If employee has taken 7 days, encashment would be for 3.5 days
Special Scenarios and Common Questions
1. Handling Negative Leave Balances
Challenge observed:
Thomas's consulting firm allowed employees to take their full year's leave allocation in advance. When an employee resigned after taking 14 days of leave but only accruing 8 days, Thomas attempted to deduct the excess 6 days from the final salary. The employee disputed this deduction, leading to a protracted MOM investigation and eventual settlement.
Deductions for excess leave are only permissible if:
Explicitly allowed in the employment contract
The employee provides written consent
The deduction doesn't exceed 25% of one month's salary
Advance leave policies should include clear terms for resignation scenarios
Record-keeping must be meticulous to justify any deductions
Practical solution:
Include explicit terms in employment contracts regarding advance leave
Obtain written acknowledgment when employees take advance leave
Consider implementing graduated leave accrual instead of full upfront allocation
Maintain detailed records of leave requests and approvals
2. Leave Encashment During Notice Period
Challenge observed:
Siti's engineering firm had a policy requiring employees to clear all leave during their notice period or forfeit it. When a senior engineer resigned and was asked to serve his full 2-month notice period without taking leave, he later requested encashment for his unused days. Siti refused, citing company policy. The subsequent MOM complaint resulted in the company having to encash the statutory portion of his leave.
Key insights:
Notice period leave policies face specific constraints:
Employers cannot force employees to use leave during notice periods
Employees have the right to encash statutory leave if not taken
"Use it or lose it" policies cannot override statutory encashment rights
Different rules may apply to garden leave arrangements
Practical solution:
Create clear policies distinguishing between statutory and contractual leave
Allow reasonable leave utilization during notice periods
Document when employees choose not to take available leave
Consider structured handover plans that accommodate some leave
3. Dismissal for Misconduct
Challenge observed:
Raj's logistics company terminated an employee for misconduct and refused to pay for any unused leave, citing "forfeiture due to dismissal" in their company handbook. The employee challenged this at the Employment Claims Tribunal, which ruled that statutory leave must be encashed even in misconduct cases, though contractual leave could be forfeited per company policy.
Key insights:
Even in misconduct cases:
Statutory leave encashment remains a legal requirement
The right to statutory leave encashment cannot be contracted away
Contractual leave may be subject to forfeiture if clearly stated in policies
Documentation of misconduct must be thorough to justify any contractual forfeiture
Practical solution:
Separate statutory and contractual leave in all termination scenarios
Consider seeking legal advice for serious misconduct cases
Common Compliance Mistakes to Avoid
Compliance mistakes to avoid
1. Applying blanket "no encashment" policies
This fundamental error ignores the distinction between statutory and contractual leave. Always encash statutory leave regardless of policy statements.
2. Using incorrect calculation formulas
Using calendar days instead of working days for calculations typically undervalues leave encashment and may violate the Employment Act.
3. Failing to prorate for partial years
Statutory leave must be prorated for incomplete years of service, both in accrual and encashment.
4. Requiring leave clearance during notice
While employers can request that employees use leave during notice periods, they cannot force this arrangement or use it to avoid encashment obligations.
5. Overlooking fixed allowances in calculations
Regular fixed monthly allowances should be included in the salary base used for leave encashment calculations.
Best Practices for Compliant Leave Management
Challenge observed:
Li Wei's technology firm treated all terminations the same way, with a standard exit checklist that didn't distinguish between resignations, terminations, and contract completions. When they faced multiple leave encashment disputes in a single quarter, they realized their one-size-fits-all approach was creating compliance gaps and administrative headaches.
Typically entitled to encashment of statutory leave
Often have higher contractual leave allocations
May have different notice period arrangements affecting encashment
Part-Time Employees
Entitled to prorated leave based on working hours
Calculation may differ from full-time employees
Still entitled to encashment of unused statutory leave
Often overlooked in standard termination procedures
Fixed-Term Contract Employees
Entitled to leave encashment if contract ends naturally
Leave should be prorated for contracts shorter than one year
Different considerations for early termination scenarios
Specific provisions may be included in contract terms
The Business Case for Getting Leave Encashment Right
Beyond legal compliance, there are compelling business reasons to handle leave encashment correctly:
1. Exit Experience Impacts Reputation
Former employees share their termination experiences, affecting your employer brand and ability to attract talent.
2. Disputes Consume Disproportionate Resources
What begins as a small leave calculation dispute can escalate into time-consuming investigations and proceedings.
3. Patterns of Non-Compliance Increase Scrutiny
MOM pays particular attention to companies with multiple complaints or demonstrated patterns of non-compliance.
4. Proper Systems Reduce Administrative Burden
Well-designed leave management systems reduce the time and effort required for termination processing.
Conclusion: From Compliance Burden to Business Process
For Singapore employers, annual leave encashment shouldn't be viewed merely as a compliance obligation but as an integral part of the employee lifecycle. By understanding the legal requirements, implementing appropriate systems, and developing clear policies, organizations can transform leave encashment from a potential problem area into a smooth, predictable business process.
Remember these key principles:
Always encash unused statutory leave upon termination
Clearly distinguish between statutory and contractual leave
Use the correct calculation formulas and proration methods
Document policies and calculations thoroughly
Treat different termination scenarios appropriately
With these practices in place, your organization can manage leave encashment confidently and compliantly, even in complex termination scenarios.
For assistance developing compliant leave management policies and procedures tailored to your organization, contact Kelick's HR Compliance specialists.
This guide provides general information about annual leave encashment in Singapore. While we strive for accuracy, employment regulations may change, and organizations should consult with legal professionals when developing employment policies.